LANGUAGE PACKS，do you have chinese version? I need it!
thanks!

it\'s ok and very good system, i need this for my work and studies

i downt know how good it is cus i down't no were to save it if any 1 knows can u email me at leon_118@hotmail.co.uk

Everytime I visit this site I read about a new bug of Vista: programs that run perfectly on XP fail on Vista, it needs a Huge amout of memory and HDD, and there's nothing needfull in the new features. It's just like Nero. They wanted to develep their software and it's GUI getting more terrible with every version, and some feauteres worked before just not work. I will NOT get Vista until XP becomes totally unsupported and I recommend you to do the same. (Maybe if XP becomes unsupported I will switch from Windows to an other OS.)

manrico939 wrote:

"They
will not sell it if it still has bugs."


You are obviously NOT talking about Microsoft here! Of cause Vista will have bugs! Just wait and see.

You will hear very clearly and very loudly the bugs and annoyances Vista has.

Vista looks better than XP. However, on performace, XP is a thoroughbred steed and Vista is an Ass.

If you are talking performance, XP leaves Vista at the starting post.

I find it remarkable how Microsoft can code such an inferior product.

I would NOT use Vista even if Bill Gates gave it to me!

Heck maybe in 5 years when computers are able to handle Vista with ease and XP is so dated, but certainly not now, not next year 2007 and likely not 2008.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it! XP with SR2 works just fine. It took long enough for XP to be working properly. I am not going to gamble on Vista.

Vista should have run FASTER on the same hardware as XP. That would have been a winner. However, Vista is a dud. A lemon. A show pony. It has all the false glamour of Windows ME (the bean counter operating system).

Vista this and Vista that. At the end of the day there is NO good reason to leave XP! Not for the next few years anyway.

Vista RC2 64bits installed is less than 20 minutes on My AMD 939 3500 2 gigs of memoryon NVidia Raid ( no more drivers needed ). This is quite better than the first intallation of beta 5342 which took 1:30hr. Only Realtek AC97 sounf drivers will need to be added.

Navigation with IE7 is improved... As a check, I got to NY Times... First attemps where painfull with previous betas, but now, front page show completely and links to articles seem to respond.

Yet, first visit to some of my pages are still difficult.

An easy way to check Windows....
go to any shop in 3 months and try it in the store. They
will not sell it if it still has bugs.

Have a nice everybody

What is faster than Vista, uses less RAM than Vista, is a smaller install than Vista, runs more software than Vista, runs more games than Vista, is able to do everything that Vista can do with a few 3rd party installations?

Windows XP

In every way, except eye candy, Windows XP is a superior operating system than Vista.

You can run XP on hardware that would grind to a halt with Vista.

That game you are getting 100 frames per second may only get 20 frames per second if you install Vista.

There is no good reason to install Vista.

Vista is the Windows ME of tomorrow.

Bloated to the max, needing new hardware and for what?

Not only did Microsoft drop the ball with Vista, they damn well blew it to shreds.

Windows XP is far superior to Vista.

Sure have a play with it for curiosity, but to play that game and use that software lightning fast, keep XP. Or spend a lot of money to get new hardware, and not notice a speed or performance increase at all.

How Microsoft can code such an inferior operating system to XP and claim it is better is astounding. They must take the public for fools.

Vista should be faster on XP type hardware - NOT slower if not unable to run at all.

The people at the top at Microsoft have lost touch with reality in their money castles.

Vista sucks.

Why is this labelled as "Freeware"? It is a 15 day TRIAL.